Tuesday, December 06, 2005
We Deserve Better
"Instead of doing science, they [ID proponents] are writing popular books and op-eds. As a result, ID remains theoretically in the same scientific place it was when Phillip Johnson wrote Darwin on Trial — little more than a roster of evolutionary theory’s weakest links... "
"After more than a decade of listening to ID proponents claim that ID is good science, don’t we deserve better than this?"
"After more than a decade of listening to ID proponents claim that ID is good science, don’t we deserve better than this?"
From Karl Giberson, editor in chief at Science & Theology News