Tuesday, December 20, 2005


Dover Victory: Unconstitutional to Teach ID as an Alternative to Evolution in a Public School Science Classroom

More from Judge Jones' ruling today (scroll down for our earlier posts):

The citizens of the Dover area were poorly served by the members of the Board who voted for the ID Policy. It is ironic that several of these individuals, who so staunchly and proudly touted their religious convictions in public, would time and again lie to cover their tracks and disguise the real purpose behind the ID Policy.

With that said, we do not question that many of the leading advocates of ID have bona fide and deeply held beliefs which drive their scholarly endeavors. Nor do we controvert that ID should continue to be studied, debated, and discussed. As stated, our conclusion today is that it is unconstitutional to teach ID as an alternative to evolution in a public school science classroom.


<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?